nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2022, 01, v.5 77-80
TCT与HPV-DNA筛查宫颈病变的价值
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
摘要:

目的:探讨宫颈液基薄层细胞学检查(TCT)和人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)-DNA筛查宫颈病变的价值。方法:选取2017年3月~2021年3月在本院进行宫颈病变筛查的2 730例女性,以病理学检查为临床诊断金标准,采用Kappa一致性检验比较TCT与HPV-DNA筛查的灵敏度、特异度、准确度和阳性预测值。结果:2 730例女性经TCT和HPV-DNA共检出阳性83例,再次经病理确诊62例宫颈病变患者,其中TCT确诊49例,HPV-DNA确诊51例。与病理学检查相比,TCT、HPV-DNA筛查宫颈病变的Kappa值分别为0.625、0.670,敏感度分别为79.03%、82.26%,特异度均为95.24%,准确率分别为83.13%、85.54%,阳性预测值分别为98.00%、98.08%,TCT联合HPV-DNA筛查宫颈病变的阳性预测值为74.70%。结论:TCT、HPV-DNA筛查宫颈病变均有较高的价值,联合检测可提高阳性患者检出率。

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the value of cervical liquid based thinprep cytology test(TCT) and human papillomavirus(HPV)-DNA in screening cervical lesions. Methods: A total of 2 730 women who were screened for cervical lesions in our hospital from March 2017 to March 2021 were selected. Taking pathological examination as the gold standard for clinical diagnosis, kappa consistency test was used to compare the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value of TCT and HPV-DNA screening. Results: A total of 83 cases were positive by TCT and HPV-DNA, and 62 cases were confirmed by pathology, including 49 cases by TCT, 51 cases by HPV-DNA. Compared with pathological examination, the kappa values of TCT and HPV-DNA screening for cervical lesions were 0.625 and 0.670, with the sensitivity of 79.03% and 82.26%, the specificity of 95.24%, the accuracy of 83.13% and 85.54%, and the positive predictive values of 98.00% and 98.08%, respectively. The positive predictive value of TCT combined with HPV-DNA screening for cervical lesions was 74.70%.Conclusion: TCT and HPV-DNA are of high value in screening cervical lesions. Combined examination can improve the detection rate of positive patients.

参考文献

[1] van Beekhuizen H J,Freulings M D,Dasgupta S,et al.Relevance of routine pathology review in cervical carcinoma[J].Virchows Arch,2020,477(2):301-307.

[2] 任康,申良方,周琴,等.局部晚期宫颈癌预后因素的研究进展[J].中国现代医学杂志,2019,29(2):38-43.

[3] 梁罗娇,王薇.宫颈癌淋巴结转移机制的研究进展[J].巴楚医学,2019,2(2):105-108.

[4] 原新丽,吴祁生,张火兵,等.液基细胞学检查在不同年龄段女性子宫颈癌前病变筛查中的现状研究[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2020,27(1):27-31.

[5] Crosbie E J,Einstein M H,Franceschi S,et al.Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer[J].Lancet,2013,382(9895):889-899.

[6] W H Organization.WHO guidelines for screening and treatment of precancerous lesions for cervical cancer prevention[M].World Health Organization,2013,4(5):1-40.

[7] 谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:407-409.

[8] Zou Z,Fairley C K,Ong J J,et al.Domestic HPV vaccine price and economic returns for cervical cancer prevention in China:a cost-effectiveness analysis[J].Lancet Glob Health,2020,8(10):e1335-e1344.

[9] Johnson C A,James D,Marzan A,et al.Cervical cancer:an overview of pathophysiology and management[J].Semin Oncol Nurs,2019,35(2):166-174.

[10] Maver P J,Poljak M.Primary HPV-based cervical cancer screening in Europe:implementation status,challenges,and future plans[J].Clin Microbiol Infect,2020,26(5):579-583.

[11] 谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:304-307.

[12] 徐晓峰.836例宫颈液基薄层细胞学检查结果分析[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2017,28(S2):403.

[13] 李景然,孙玉秀,朱健生.HPV DNA和TCT在宫颈病变中的应用价值[J].中国感染控制杂志,2015(3):192-195.

[14] Aydogan Kirmizi D,Baser E,Demir Caltekin M,et al.Concordance of HPV,conventional smear,colposcopy and conization results in cervical dysplasia[J].Diagn Cytopathol,2021,49(1):132-139.

[15] 屈海红,赵帅华,胡文娟.宫颈高危型HPV检测联合阴道镜检查对宫颈癌前病变的预测价值的前瞻性队列研究[J].实用癌症杂志,2018,33(12):2073-2076.

[16] 陈多多.HR-HPV DNA检测联合液基细胞学检查在宫颈癌及癌前病变中的筛查价值[J].医学临床研究,2019,36(4):722-724.

[17] Liu Y,Zhang L,Zhao G,et al.The clinical research of thinprep cytology test (TCT) combined with HPV-DNA detection in screening cervical cancer[J].Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-Le-Grand),2017,63(2):92-95.

[18] 孙茂春,康晓琳.HPV-DNA联合TCT检查对于诊断宫颈疾病的价值及其病理分型研究[J].中国妇幼健康研究,2016,27(5):647-649.

基本信息:

中图分类号:R737.33

引用信息:

[1]卫银娟.TCT与HPV-DNA筛查宫颈病变的价值[J].巴楚医学,2022,5(01):77-80.

发布时间:

2022-03-30

出版时间:

2022-03-30

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索