nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 01, v.7 92-96
CT胆管成像与磁共振胆胰管成像鉴别良恶性胆道梗阻的诊断价值
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金项目(No:81901797); 江苏大学临床医学科技发展基金项目(No:JLY2021198)
邮箱(Email): elyn20@163.com;
DOI:
摘要:

目的:探讨电子计算机断层扫描(CT)胆管成像与磁共振胆胰管成像(MRCP)对良恶性胆道梗阻的诊断价值。方法:选择2017年6月—2022年12月在兴化市人民医院接受诊治的胆道梗阻患者83例,所有患者均接受CT胆管成像及MRCP检查,比较这两种检查方法在鉴别良恶性胆道梗阻中的诊断价值。结果:以患者术后病理检查结果为金标准,分为恶性组23例和良性组60例。CT胆管成像检查中恶性组患者胆道狭窄(78.26%vs 36.67%)、胆道边缘模糊(69.57%vs 25.00%)及胆道形态变异(73.91%vs 28.33%)的发生率较良性组显著升高(均P<0.05)。MRCP检查中恶性组患者胆胰管汇合角度[(43.58±1.48)°vs (25.78±2.58)°]、胆总管直径(6.79±0.24 mm vs 4.78±0.32 mm)及胰管直径(2.99±0.13 mm vs 2.11±0.26 mm)显著高于良性组(均P<0.05)。CT胆管成像与MRCP对胆道梗阻良恶性的诊断敏感度分别为91.30%、95.65%,特异度分别为100.0%、100.0%,Kappa值分别为93.80%和97.00%。结论:CT胆管成像与MRCP在鉴别良恶性胆道梗阻方面都有较高的诊断价值。

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of computed tomography(CT) cholangiography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP) in benign and malignant biliary obstruction. Methods: A total of 83 patients with biliary obstruction who were treated in Xinghua People's Hospital from June 2017 to December 2022 were selected. All patients received CT cholangiography and MRCP. The diagnostic value of these two methods in distinguishing benign and malignant biliary obstruction was compared. Results: The patients were divided into the malignant group(23 cases) and the benign group(60 cases) according to the gold standard of pathological examination. In CT cholangiography, the incidence of biliary stenosis(78.26% vs 36.67%), biliary margin blur(69.57% vs 25.00%) and biliary morphological variation(73.91% vs 28.33%) in the malignant group were significantly higher than those in the benign group(all P<0.05). In MRCP examination, the confluent angle [(43.58±1.48)° vs(25.78±2.58)°], diameter of common bile duct(6.79±0.24 mm vs 4.78±0.32 mm) and diameter of pancreatic duct(2.99±0.13 mm vs 2.11±0.26 mm) in the malignant group were significantly higher than those in the benign group(all P<0.05). The sensitivity of CT cholangiography and MRCP in the diagnosis of benign and malignant biliary obstruction was 91.30% and 95.65%, the specificity was 100.0% and 100.0%, and Kappa value was 93.80% and 97.00%, respectively. Conclusion: CT cholangiography and MRCP both have high diagnostic value in differentiating benign and malignant biliary obstruction.

参考文献

[1] 黄梦月,张勇,高雪梅,等.压缩感知磁共振胰胆管成像对胆总管良恶性梗阻的诊断价值[J].磁共振成像,2023,14(3):100-104.

[2] Samara O,Azzam M I,Alshrouf M A,et al.Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the detection of choledocholithiasis[J].J Clin Ultrasound,2022,50(2):247-253.

[3] Selvaraj E A,Ba-Ssalamah A,Poetter-Lang S,et al.A quantitative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography metric of intrahepatic biliary dilatation severity detects high-risk primary sclerosing cholangitis[J].Hepatol Commun,2022,6(4):795-808.

[4] Toledo P F,Cárdenas G,Berger Z,et al.Neostigmine? improves pancreatic duct visualization in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and could be a cheap alternative for secretin[J].Turk J Gastroenterol,2022,33(8):704-709.

[5] 李玮,全硕,张晓东,等.压缩感知及梯度自旋回波序列优化3D MR胰胆管成像图像质量的可行性[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2022,19(11):720-724.

[6] Wang L,Liu S,Li Y Y.Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to evaluate improvement effect of FXR regulating bile acid on hepatocellular carcinoma with obstructive jaundice[J].Contrast Media Mol Imaging,2022,2022:3544735.

[7] 刘念,黄小华,董国礼,等.高场2D-SSFSE和3D-FRFSE序列胆胰管成像质量及显示程度的对比研究[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2013,19(6):514-518.

[8] 李妍.MRI联合MRCP在诊断胆管癌中的应用[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2022,20(8):115-117.

[9] 李耀锋,杨静,许盼丽,等.3D-SPACE序列和3D-TSE序列成像在胰胆管成像中的应用价值[J].贵州医药,2022,46(6):962-963.

[10] Staubli S M,Maloca P,Kuemmerli C,et al.Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography enhanced by virtual reality as a novel tool to improve the understanding of biliary anatomy and the teaching of surgical trainees[J].Front Surg,2022,9:916443.

[11] Suzuki M,Sekino Y,Hosono K,et al.Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of computed tomography-negative common bile duct stone:prospective randomized controlled trial[J].Dig Endosc,2022,34(5):1052-1059.

[12] 马海锋,江魁明.3.0T磁共振术前诊断儿童胰胆管合流异常的价值[J].昆明医科大学学报,2022,43(10):110-114.

[13] 李青,王传兵,徐露露,等.3D SPACE与屏气压缩感知技术在MRCP成像中的对比研究[J].中国医疗设备,2022,37(9):57-60.

[14] 王淳正,许来艳,侯莉莉.EUS检查与MRCP成像对IPMN良恶性鉴别诊断效能对比[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2022,20(5):139-141.

[15] 沈中原,王嫚,李飞,等.探讨Gd-BOPTA增强CE-MRC显示胆管成像最佳延迟时间和应用价值[J].中国CT和MRI杂志,2022,20(12):106-108.

[16] Breakey S,Harris A C.Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the setting of acute pancreaticobiliary disease:can certain clinical factors guide appropriate utilization?[J].Can Assoc Radiol J,2022,73(1):27-29.

[17] Cazzagon N,El Mouhadi S,Vanderbecq Q,et al.Quantitative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography metrics are associated with disease severity and outcomes in people with primary sclerosing cholangitis[J].JHEP Rep,2022,4(11):100577.

[18] 万承鑫,郁斌,陆云峰,等.3D-GRASE序列联合阴性对比剂在MRCP中的应用价值初探[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2022,28(4):372-378.

[19] 祝琼洁,何健,黎琪,等.肠型与胰胆管型壶腹周围癌磁共振征象的对比观察[J].中华医学杂志,2022,102(18):1351-1358.

[20] 陶洁,黄波,邓勋伟,等.MRCP技术联合血清CEA、CA19-9及CA242检测在胆道恶性梗阻中的诊断价值[J].解放军医药杂志,2021,33(12):79-82.

[21] 王玉涛.磁共振胰胆管成像对胆管癌的诊断价值[J].河南外科学杂志,2019,25(5):49-51.

基本信息:

中图分类号:R445.2;R735.8;R730.44

引用信息:

[1]杨懿,朱宝林.CT胆管成像与磁共振胆胰管成像鉴别良恶性胆道梗阻的诊断价值[J].巴楚医学,2024,7(01):92-96.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金项目(No:81901797); 江苏大学临床医学科技发展基金项目(No:JLY2021198)

发布时间:

2024-03-27

出版时间:

2024-03-27

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索